BWC Logo

United Methodism and the Maryland ballot


BY REV. BARRY HIDEY
BEL AIR UNITED METHODIST CHURCH

We are John Wesley’s sons and daughters and we, too, need to speak to our culture. We need to clearly understand that The United Methodist Church has spoken on issues that are being debated throughout the state of Maryland and beyond.

United Methodists have prayed, studied, participated in holy conferencing, and debated to discern what The United Methodist Church must teach to its people and say to the world. Maryland’s voters need to hear not the loudest voice, nor another slick commercial to help them discern how to vote. No, they deserve to hear what The United Methodist Church has decided together.

There are three ballot issues before our state on November 6. As you discern how you will vote on these issues, it’s important to allow your faith to be a part of your decision-making process. But what’s most important is that you vote and participate in the political landscape that shapes our culture. Below is information about the teachings of our church for you to consider as you prayerfully discern how you will cast your ballot.

Question 4
Referendum Petition
Public Institutions of Higher Education – Tuition Rates

Establishes that individuals, including undocumented immigrants, are eligible to pay in-state tuition rates at community colleges in Maryland, provided the student meets certain conditions relating to attendance and graduation from a Maryland high school, filing of income taxes, intent to apply for permanent residency, and registration with the selective service system (if required); makes such students eligible to pay in-state tuition rates at a four-year public college or university if the student has first completed 60 credit hours or graduated from a community college in Maryland; provides that students qualifying for in-state tuition rates by this method will not be counted as in-state students for purposes of counting undergraduate enrollment; and extends the time in which honorably discharged veterans may qualify for in-state tuition rates.

The United Methodist Church, in its Social Principles in the 2008 Book of Resolutions states:

¶ 162 H) Rights of Immigrants — "We recognize, embrace, and affirm all persons, regardless of country of origin, as members of the family of God. We affirm the right of all persons to equal opportunities for employment, access to housing, health care, education, and freedom from social discrimination. We urge the Church and society to recognize the gifts, contributions, and struggles of those who are immigrants and to advocate for justice for all."

Question 6
Referendum Petition
Civil Marriage Protection Act

Establishes that Maryland’s civil marriage laws allow gay and lesbian couples to obtain a civil marriage license, provided they are not otherwise prohibited from marrying; protects clergy from having to perform any particular marriage ceremony in violation of their religious beliefs; affirms that each religious faith has exclusive control over its own theological doctrine regarding who may marry within that faith; and provides that religious organizations and certain related entities are not required to provide goods, services, or benefits to an individual related to the celebration or promotion of marriage in violation of their religious beliefs.

The United Methodist Church, in its 2008 Book of Discipline, states:

¶ 161 B) Marriage — "We affirm the sanctity of the marriage covenant that is expressed in love, mutual support, personal commitment, and shared fidelity between a man and a woman. We believe that God’s blessing rests upon such marriage, whether or not there are children of the union.

"We reject social norms that assume different standards for women than for men in marriage. We support laws in civil society that define marriage as the union of one man and one woman."

¶ 341.6 — Ceremonies that celebrate homosexual unions shall not be conducted by our ministers and shall not be conducted in our churches.

The Social Creed of The United Methodist Church states:

"We affirm the family and work to strengthen its relationships. We affirm the sanctity of marriage and shared fidelity between a man and a woman. We recognize divorce as regrettable and intend to minister to the members of divorced families. We affirm the integrity of single persons. We recognize that sexuality is a good gift of God and that sex between a man and woman is only to be clearly affirmed in the marriage bond." 

Question 7
Gaming Expansion Referendum
Gaming Expansion

Do you favor the expansion of commercial gaming in the State of Maryland for the primary purpose of raising revenue for education to authorize video lottery operation licensees to operate “table games” as defined by law; to increase from 15,000 to 16,500 the maximum number of video lottery terminals that may be operated in the State; and to increase from 5 to 6 the maximum number of video lottery operation licenses that may be awarded in the State and allow a video lottery facility to operate in Prince George’s County?

The United Methodist Church, in its 2008 Book of Resolutions, states:

"When asked which commandment is first of all, Jesus answered, 'Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength' (Mark 12:29-30 NRSV). Gambling feeds on human greed and invites persons to place their trust in possessions rather than in God. It represents a form of idolatry that contradicts the first commandment. Jesus said: 'The second is this, You shall love your neighbor as yourself' (Mark 12:31b NRSV). In relating with compassion to our sisters and brothers, we are called to resist those practices and systems that exploit them and leave them impoverished and demeaned. The apostle Paul wrote in 1 Timothy 6:9-10a: 'People who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge men into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil.'

"Gambling, as a means of acquiring material gain by chance and at the neighbor's expense, is a menace to personal character and social morality. Gambling fosters greed and stimulates the fatalistic faith in chance. Organized and commercial gambling is a threat to business, breeds crime and poverty, and is destructive to the interests of good government. It encourages the belief that work is unimportant, that money can solve all our problems, and that greed is the norm for achievement. It serves as a "regressive tax" on those with lower income. In summary, gambling is bad economics; gambling is bad public policy; and gambling does not improve the quality of life.

The church's position is stated in the denomination's Social Principles (¶ 163G of the 2008 Book of Discipline):

  • "Gambling is a menace to society, deadly to the best interests of moral, social, economic, and spiritual life, and destructive of good government. As an act of faith and concern, Christians should abstain from gambling and should strive to minister to those victimized by the practice.
  • "Where gambling has become addictive, the Church will encourage such individuals to receive therapeutic assistance so that the individual's energies may be redirected into positive and constructive ends.
  • "The Church should promote standards and personal lifestyles that would make unnecessary and undesirable the resort to commercial gambling—including public lotteries—as a recreation, as an escape, or as a means of producing public revenue or funds for support of charities or government.
  • "The Church’s prophetic call is to promote standards of justice and advocacy that would make it unnecessary and undesirable to resort to commercial gambling—including public lotteries, casinos, raffles, Internet gambling, gambling with an emerging wireless technology and other games of chance—as a recreation, as an escape, or as a means of producing public revenue or funds for support of charities or government."

In practice, this means that United Methodist churches should not raise funds through methods such as raffles, lotteries, bingo or drawings for door prizes or through games of chance such as bingo.

Why is the Church getting involved in politics?

Since the days of John Wesley, Methodists have had a strong belief in social justice, mission and outreach ministries. In our 2004 Book of Resolutions, we state,

“Taking an active stance in society is nothing new for followers of John Wesley. He set the example for us to combine personal and social piety. Ever since predecessor churches to United Methodism flourished in the United States, we have been known as a denomination involved with people’s lives, with political and social struggles, having local to international mission implications. Such involvement is an expression of the personal change we experience in our baptism and conversion.

“The United Methodist Church believes God’s love for the world is an active and engaged love, a love seeking justice and liberty. We cannot just be observers. So we care enough about people’s lives to risk interpreting God’s love, to take a stand, to call each of us into a response, no matter how controversial or complex. The church helps us think and act out a faith perspective, not just responding to all the other "mind-makers-up" that exist in our society.”

Issue Date: 
Wed, 10/24/2012

Comments

Maryland Question 6

With regard to the comments by Rev. Barry Hidey about Question 6, I'd like to also mention paragraph 161 J.  This paragraph states that civil rights are to be given to all persons, regardless of sexual orientation.  Question 6 is all about civil rights and not about marriage in the Church.  I believe that fairness with regard to granting a civil marriage license to persons regardless of sexual orientation is the support that United Methodists should give to encourage all persons to find a committed and loving relationship with the person they love.
 
The Rev. Nancy Webb, retired
The Rev. Nancy J. Webb
5203 Catalpha Road
Baltimore, MD 21214
410-444-7222

MD Questions up for voting

Thanks to Rev. Hidey for a wonderful explaination on how United Methodist should vote on questions 4, 6, & 7.  Unfortunately, Question 5 was not addressed.  To me, the Democractic party in MD is attempting to eliminate the Republican party leaving only one voice to be heard in Annapolis.  It would be like a "Yes" party, kind of like they have in Communist countries.  United Methodist are to stand up and make sure all voices are heard and represented.  Vote "No" to Question 5.

Other Disciplinary Viewpoints

We would like to thank Rev. Hidey for the reminder that every vote counts. With regard to Question 6, Rev. Hidey quotes three provisions that imply that the UM Discipline speaks against Question 6.  He neglected, however, to remind us that Paragraph 161J of the Discipline  would support a YES vote on Question 6. Paragraph 161J of our UM Discipline says: 

“Certain basic human rights and civil liberties are due all persons.  We are committed to supporting those rights and liberties for all persons, regardless of sexual orientation.  We see a clear issue of simple justice in protecting the rightful claims where people have shared material resources, pensions, guardian relationships, mutual powers of attorney, and other such lawful claims typically attendant to contractual relationships that involve shared contributions, responsibilities, and liabilities, and equal protection before the law.  Moreover, we support efforts to stop violence and other forms of coercion against all persons regardless of sexual orientation.”

Question 6 would allow for civil marriage of gay and lesbian couples in the State of Maryland.  It DOES NOT change our United Methodist Discipline.  In fact, it carefully protects our rights as UMs to marry only those couples whom we deem are fit to be married.  Question 6 would, however, allow loving, committed, same-sex couples who reside in Maryland to have the same legal and civil rights that all other heterosexual couples are allowed.  This is exactly what Paragraph 161J proclaims.

Our UM tradition, beliefs, and Discipline have guided us to being visionary on many issues of justice - caring for the poor, the imprisoned, the homeless, the victims of horrible disasters, standing up for the rights of children, etc.  However, the UMC has lagged woefully behind on many issues associated with the equal treatment of all of God's children.  We do not have to go back too many editions of the Discipline (early 1970s) to find one that condoned the separation of the races and forbade the ordination of women and blacks.  The laws of Maryland as recently as the 1960s forbade interracial marriage.  President Obama's parents would not have been allowed to be married in the state of Maryland at that time.   Those anti-interracial marriage laws were deemed unconstitutional in 1967 by the US Supreme Court. Question 6 allows for the same protection of gay and lesbian families.  It is time to step forward, not backward!

United Methodists acknowledge our differences and in many cases we embrace them. We represent many UMs who support Question 6.

Wanda Cockrell, Chair

Mittie Quinn, Vice-Chair

Baltimore Washington Area Reconciling United Methodists